Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2021 (5) TMI 776

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....or the sake of convenience the facts are extracted from the appeal of assessee in ITA No.6797/M/2018 for assessment year 2011-12. 3. Shri Ashok Patil appearing on behalf of the assessee submitted that the assessee is engaged in investment and trading of shares and future and options. During the period relevant to assessment year under appeal, the assessee apart from incomes assessable under others head of income has earned capital gains (short/long term capital gains) on sale of shares. The assessee has also earned interest income and dividend income. In the return of income for AY 2011-12, the assessee has declared short term capital gain of Rs. 15,50, 041/- from sale of shares. In scrutiny assessment proceeds, the Assessing Officer trea....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ical. Thus, the issue raised by the assessee in ground No.1 of the appeal is squarely covered by the decisions of Tribunal in assessee's own case. 4. The ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that in ground No.2 of appeal the assessee has assailed disallowance made under section 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short 'the Act') r.w.r 8D(2) of the Income Tax Rules, 1962 (in short 'the Rules'). The ld. Counsel for the assessee contended that during the period relevant to assessment year under appeal, the assessee earned dividend income of Rs. 4,21,195/-. No suo-motu disallowance was made by the assessee in respect of exempt income earned. The Assessing Officer invoking the provisos of Rule -8D and computed disallowance of Rs. 20,98,875/-....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....number of transactions were 363. The Tribunal after examining the entire facts held that the transactions were carried on account of capital investments. The ld. Counsel for the assessee vehemently contended that by no stretch to imagination the frequency of sale and purchases of share transactions is high looking at the size of assessee's portfolio. He referred to investments reflected in the balance sheet consisting of 197 quoted shares at the end of the year. The ld. Counsel for the assessee further referred to CBDT Circular No.4 of 2007 dated 16/06/2007 to contend that the assessee can have two portfolios one comprising of securities, which are to be treated as capital assets and the trading portfolio comprising of stock in trade. 7. ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....re more than 360. Thereafter, in assessment years 2008-09, 2012-13 and 2014-15 similar issue had come up before the Tribunal where the Assessing Officer had changed the head of income in respect of income earned by the assessee from sale of shares. The assessee offered the income as 'short term capital gains' and the Assessing Officer treated the same as 'business income'. The Tribunal decided the issue in each of the aforesaid assessment years by following the order of Tribunal in assessee's own case in ITA No.2285/Mum/2010 for assessment year 2006-07(supra). The Tribunal accepted assessee's plea that the income from sale of shares has rightly been disclosed under the head short term capital gains and rejected Revenue's view of holding the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., the assessee has assailed initiation of penalty proceeding under section 271(1)(c) of the Act. Challenge to penalty proceedings at this stage is premature, ergo, the ground No.4 is dismissed as such. 12. In the result, appeal by the assessee is partly allowed. ITA No.156/Mum/2019 (A.Y.2015-16): 13. The ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted at the outset that the grounds raised by the assessee are identical to the grounds raised in assessment year 2011-12. The submissions made while addressing the grounds in assessment year 2011-12 would equally apply to the grounds raised in assessment year 2015-16. The ld. Counsel pointed that the issue of disallowance u/s 14A can be remitted back to the Assessing Officer for verification of exempt i....