Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2019 (9) TMI 1541

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... 2009-10. 2. The grounds of appeal filed by the assessee read as under : 1.1. The Id. CIT (A) erred in confirming the action of the assessing officer ("the A.O") whereby the AO disallowed the Appellant's claim of deduction under section 35AC of the Act amounting to Rs. 3,00,000/- being amount paid to Navjeevan Charitable Trust in a very cryptic and arbitrary manner. 1.2. While doing so the Id. CIT (A) failed to appreciate that: i. that the A.O while disallowing the Appellant's claim based his conclusion on suspicion, surmises and conjecture, taking into account irrelevant, extraneous and impermissible considerations and ignoring relevant material and considerations placed before him, ii. the Appell....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... that he had given donation by account payee cheques only and on the basis of documents produced before him by the trustee of Navjeevan Charitable Trust; as per the documents, the said Trust is registered with Charity Commissioner, Mumbai and also u/s 12A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 with PAN : AAATN6332N; the Trust is also registered under FCRA, 1976. It was explained to the AO that on presentation of the above facts by one Mr. Ashok Bagadia, trustee of the said Trust, the assessee has given donation. It was further explained to the AO that on receipt on the notice to showcause, the assessee tried to contact Mr. Bagadia but was informed that Mr. Bagadia expired on 06.11.2014. Further, it was submitted before the AO that as per the copy of t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....jeevan' project of the Trust notified u/s 35AC of the Act. It is stated by him that during the re-assessment proceedings, the assessee, to substantiate his claim of donation of Rs. 3,00,000/-, had filed before the AO (i) Copy of Official gazette dated 12.01.2009, where the Central Government had notified the Trust for a period of 3 years beginning from financial year 2008 - 09, (ii) Copy of letter from Ministry of Home Affairs granting registration to the Trust under the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 1976, (iii) P.A.N. Card issued to the Trust (iv) Presentation given by the Trust to the Appellant for procuring donation for its activities (v) Receipt along with Form No. 58 A issued by the Trust for the donation given to it (vi)....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tion conducted u/s 132 of the Act on Navjeevan Charitable Trust on 27.10.2014, it was found by the Investigation Wing of the Department that all the expenses of the Trust were mere book entries and no genuine expenses were made by the Trust for the purpose of section 35AC of the Act. During the course of search, one of the trustees accepted that all the expenses were bogus and the donations received in cheques were returned in cash to all the donors after deducting nominal commission. The Ld. DR thus supports the order passed by the CIT(A). 7. We have heard the rival submissions and perused the relevant materials on record. Indisputably, the assessee, in order to substantiate his claim of donation of Rs. 3,00,000/- paid to Navjeevan....