2018 (5) TMI 2060

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... against the Order-in-Original No.CCE/BBSR II/No.22-23/Commissioner/2012 dated 20.03.2012 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Customs & Service Tax, BBSR II. 3. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that during the period from October, 2009 to March, 2011, the appellant had availed cenvat credit on various inputs, capital goods and services. The demand has been confirmed against them for utilizing the cenvat credit from the common pool account towards discharging their service tax liability. But the same was not allowed by the Department. Being aggrieved, the appellant has filed the present appeal. 4. With these background, Shri K. K. Acharya, ld.Counsel for the appellant, submits that they utilized the cenvat credit for ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....a provider of output service shall be allowed to take credit on various duties and that is the substantive provision in the rules. That is titled "Cenvat credit". That takes within its fold the duty of excise, other duties and service tax leviable under Section 66 of the Finance Act, 1994 and thereafter with effect from 18 April, 2006, service tax leviable under Section 66A of the said Act. If these are various duties of which credit can be availed of, then, further sub-rules as analyzed by the Tribunal in paragraph 5 do not suffer from any perversity. The only difficulty that may have been presented throughout was of scrutiny and verification of the accounts. The accounts are maintained in relation to payments of both levies. Even that doe....