2021 (5) TMI 637

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....f the grievance of the assessee is that the ld.CIT(A) has erred in confirming the addition of Rs. 29,39,524/- and Rs. 50,45,333/- in the Asstt.Year 2003-04 and 2004-05 respectively on the ground that the assessee has received the above amount as onmoney on sale of land. 3. The facts on all vital points are verbatim same, more so the discussions in both the assessment orders are also identical. Therefore for the facility of reference, we take the facts from the Asstt.Year 2003-04. 4. Brief facts of the case are that in both the assessment years, originally the assessment orders were passed under section 143(3) read with section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on 28.12.2007 whereby the income of the assessee was determined at Rs. 29,86,640/....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... issue back to the file of AO. "7. We have considered the rival submissions and perused the materials on record and gone through the orders of authorities below. We find that this addition was confirmed by Ld. CIT(A) on this basis that the matter is pending finalization at the assessment stage itself in the case of land owners. This addition in the hands of the present assessee is confirmed on a protective basis as per order of Ld. CIT(A) dated 14-12-2007. Hence, we feel that by now, the issue first have been finalized in the hands of the land owners but the same is not made available before us. Hence in the facts of the present case, we feel that the matter should go back to the file of AO for fresh decision and hence, we set aside the o....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....such sale consideration or not. 6. In response to the said notice, Shri Pankaj Mordani, CA from K.G. Pate! & Co., Chartered Accountants attended and made written submissions. Some of the main/relevant contentions are reproduced as under; "Your assessee was a PA holder of the land holders and there was having no direct or indirect benefit to him - All the owners of the land has been identified and from the working of the capital gains it reveals that there is no tax liabilities to 12 nos. of land holders. Your honour can very well verify that Shri Bankimbhai D. Patel was only acted as POA of all the co-owners of the land and the sale consideration were received by the owner of the land. Ail the land owners have been identified and from....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Ld.CIT(A). Penalty proceedings u/s. 271(1)(c) is separately Initiated for concealing the particulars of income. 8. Subject to above remarks and on the basis of material available on records, the total income of the assessee for A.Y, 2003-04 is computed as under: Total income as per return of income : Rs. 47,120 Add: Addition on account of unrecorded and Undisclosed income as discussed above ; Rs. 29,39,524 Total Income : Rs. 29,86,644 Rounded off to : Rs. 29,86,640" 8. Findings in the Asstt.Year 2004-05 are also identical. On the strength of the above reasoning, the ld.AO has made addition which stands confirmed at the end of the ld.CIT(A). 9. With the assistance of the ld.representatives, we have gone through the record c....