Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2021 (5) TMI 632

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e the submission made by the appellant. 3. That the disallowance made is not based on the facts of the case and needs to be deleted. 4. That, the appellant, carves leave to add alter and/or delete any of the grounds of appeal. Assessment Year 2014-15 1. That the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) erred in confirming disallowance made by the Assessing Officer at Rs. 1120776/- on account of interest expense. 2.That the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) failed to appreciate the submission made by the appellant. 3. That the disallowance made is not based on the facts of the case and needs to be deleted. 4. That, the appellant, carves leave to add alter and/or delete any of the grounds of appeal. 3. As accepted by both the parties since the facts involved and issues raised in these appeals are common and pertaining to same assessee these appeals were heard together and are being disposed off by this common order for the sake of convenience and brevity. 4. On perusal of the grounds we find that the common grievance is against the finding of Ld. CIT(A) confirming the disallowance of interests expense....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....red. That the AO has pointedly mentioned on page 2 of the assessment order that interest @ 18% to be received form Kalani Industries and @ 12% from M/s Padma Homes Pvt. Ltd. That the AO calculated the disallowance considering the rate of interest paid to bank @ 16% intend of 12% in most of the cases. That as stated above the assessee was carrying on the business of money lending for the past may years. Too substantiate the above claim a copy of the assessment order for assessment year 2006-07 is enclosed for ready perusal. That the complete chart in respect of the amount of interest paid is enclosed. Copy of assessment order with details for assessment year 2012-13 is also enclosed. With this synopsis, a perusal of the same will show that rate of interest paid is between 12% to 15% and around 16% on overdraft from bank. That therefore the AO should not have calculated the disallowance considering the amount of interest paid to the bank. Secondly the point to be considered is that interest @18% was charged from the amount advanced to Kalani Industries. It therefore is beyond doubt that the assessee was prudently carrying on her business. That the learned AO ignored....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....of fact, out of which no substantial question of law can be said to arise, requiring consideration under section 260a of the Act. Moreover, since in the case of the assessee itself, the court had decided on similar facts earlier and dismissed the Revenue's appeal, there was no reason to take a different view of the matter for the assessment year 2013-14. We may submit here the question before the High Court was that when the assessee had not advanced interest bearing fund without charging any interest. The Hon'ble High Court referred to the following cases: (i) Commissioner of Income tax vs. Lokhandwala Construction Inds. Ltd (Bombay High Court) 260 ITR 579 "Where an assessee claims deduction of interest paid on capital borrowed, all that the assessee has to show is that the capital which was borrowed was used for business purpose in the relevant year of account and it does not mater whether the capital was borrowed in order to acquire a revenue asset or a capital asset." (ii) S. A. Builders Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income tax (Appeals) and Another (Supreme Court of India) "Interest on borrowed capital - Interest on money borrowe....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....f in the arm-chair of the businessman or in the position of the board of directors and assume the role to decide how much is reasonable expenditure having regard to the circumstances of the case. No businessman can be compelled to maximize his profits. 8. Per contra Ld. Departmental Representative vehemently argued supporting the orders of both the lower authorities. 9. We have heard rival contentions and perused the records placed before us and carefully gone through the submissions made by the Ld. Counsel for the assessee as well as finding of both the lower authorities. The instant appeal pertains to Assessment Years 2013-14 and 2014-15. Though various grounds are raised but the sole grievance is commonly raised against the disallowance of interest expenditure of Rs. 9,22,643/- and Rs. 11,20,776/- for Assessment Years 2013-14 and 2014-15 respectively. 10. We observe that the assessee is into money lending business and holds registration certificate for running this business given by the local authority. Books of accounts are regularly maintained and audited u/s 44AB of the Act. Assessee is regularly accepting both secured and unsecured loans on interest and giving loans....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....erest is being carried out regularly round the year. It shows that interest paid on secured and unsecured loan is wholly and exclusively for the business purpose of earning income from loans and advances. 13. The allowability of interest paid on borrowed capital where interest bearing funds have been advanced interest free to the sister concern was deliberated upon by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in S.A. Builders (supra) 288 ITR 1 (SC). The ratio laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court is as under:- " In order to decide whether interest on funds borrowed by the assessee to give an interest free loan to a sister concern (e.g., a subsidiary of the assessee) should be allowed as a deduction under section 36(1)(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, one has to enquire whether the loan was given by the assessee as a measure of commercial expediency. The expression "commercial expediency" is one of wide import and includes such expenditure as a prudent businessman incures for the purpose of business. The expenditure may not have been incurred under any legal obligation, but yet it is allowable as business expenditure if it was incurred on grounds of commercial expediency." 14. Exam....