2017 (3) TMI 1839

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t referred to any seized document or material in the Assessment order on the basis of which additions have been made and thereby the conditions of Sec. 153C are not satisfied. 3. The Ld. CIT (A) ought to have appreciated the fact that no incriminating material was found relating to year under consideration to invoke the provisions of section 153C of the Act. 4. The Ld. CIT(A)-VII, ought to have appreciated that addition so made does not have any nexus with the material impounded during search and such addition made is bad in law. 5. The Ld. CIT(A)-VII, ought to have considered the issue that the appellant is entitled to claim an amount of Rs. 42,26,393/- towards deduction u/s 35Dof the Act. 6. The assessee may add, alter or modify o....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d. Vs. DCIT [1288-1293/H/2014] 11. The Ld. CIT(A) ought to have annulled the Order of the Assessing Officer appreciating that invoking the provisions vi] s. 153C without recording satisfaction by the I.T. Authority who conducted the search & seizure operation on the searched party as well as by the Assessing Officer having jurisdiction over the impugned assessee becomes invalid as held by the Hon'ble A.P. High Court in the case of CIT Vs. MIs. Shettys Pharmaceuticals & Biological Ltd in ITTA Nos.662 of 2014 dated 26-11-2014. 12. The learned CIT (A) ought to have appreciated that the material found in premises of M/s. Madhucon Projects Ltd does not belong to the appellant for the year under consideration and that the proceeding u/s....