2017 (11) TMI 1949

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r, D.R. ORDER PER: S.K. MOHANTY This appeal is directed against the impugned order dated 25.02.2010 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals), Customs & Central Excise, Raipur. 2. Brief facts of the case are that the appellant is engaged in the manufacture of Sponge Irons, M.S. Billets, falling under Chapter 72 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The appellant has also installed a capti....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... against the appellant alongwith interest and penalty was imposed on the appellant. On appeal, the ld. Commissioner (Appeals) vide the impugned order has dropped the penalty imposed in the adjudication order and only confirmed the adjudged demand with regard to the denial of Cenvat Credit. 3. During the course of hearing today, the ld. Advocate appearing for the appellant submitted the letter d....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rded in the impugned order. 5. On perusal of the letter dated 29.12.2010 of the appellant, addressed to the Jurisdictional Range Superintendent alongwith the statement and Chartered Accountant's Certificate, I find that the appellant had reflected the percentage of electricity consumed within the factory and that wheeled out to Grid against receipt of monetary consideration. However, since such....