Loading...

โœ•
Top
Help
Draft a reply to a
tax notice โ€” free ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days ยท No card needed

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ up to 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1996 (8) TMI 562

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... D.N. Baruah, J. 1. As per the direction given by this Court in Civil Rule No. 1 (M) of 1994, the Tribunal, Gauhati Bench, Guwahati, has referred the following question under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ('the Act') for opinion of this Court: "Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal being the final finding authority was justified ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....creditor himself appeared before the ITO to give his statement confirming the fact that the amount had been paid by him to the assessee. Even then the Assessing Officer did not believe this and made an addition of Rs. 1,25,000 under section 68 of the Act. Being aggrieved, the assessee preferred an appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals). The Commissioner (Appeals) allowed the appeal after conside....