TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2019 (10) TMI 1414
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....S.Chattopadhyay, Authorized Representative for the Respondent (s) ORDER None appeared on behalf of the appellant. Since the appeal pertains to an earlier period, the same is being taken up for hearing with the consent of the learned Authorized Representative for the Respondent Revenue. 2. The present appeal is filed by the appellant against Order-in-Appeal No.34/KOL-II/2013 dated 11 June 2013 p....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ebit Notes subsequently for its entire sale to M/s.TRL for the differential amounts. M/s.TRL passed on the burden of such Debit Notes, including the differential Central Excise duty element involved to its customer including the appellants, by raising supplementary invoices. The differential duty was paid by M/s.TSL. Show-cause notice dated 13.03.2012 was issued alleging that the appellant had tak....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....dated 15.05.2018 in respect of Excise Appeal No.75 of 2012, in the case of Pushkar Techno Private Limited wherein the Tribunal on identical facts had decided the appeal in favour of the assessee. He further submts that the facts of the present case are squarely covered by the aforesaid decision of the Tribunal. 5. We find that the input supplier also issued supplementary invoices to the appellant....