2014 (3) TMI 1175

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d to be treated as Income from business for computing deduction u/s. 10A 1. Bank Interest Rs. 1,02,022/- 2. Job Work Charges Rs. 19,26,857/- 3. Exchange difference on loans Rs. 18,62,865/-   -----------------   Rs. 38,91,744/-   ------------------ 2. The assessee is having a manufacturing unit at SEEPZ, Mumbai for manufacturing of studded jewellery for export, the assessee claimed exemption u/s 10A in respect of the business income. The AO disallowed the claim of exemption u/s 10A in respect of following incomes:- 1. Bank Interest Rs. 1,02,022/- 2. Job Work Charges Rs. 19,26,857/- 3. Exchange difference on loans Rs. 18,62,865/-   -----------------   Rs. 38,91,744/-   -------------....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....o of decision of the Supreme Court in the case of ACG Associated Capsules P. Ltd, cited supre, and allow interest income having direct nexus with the interest income." 5. It is clear from the finding of CIT(A) that the AO was directed to consider the netting of expenses in view of the decisions of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of ACG Associated Capsules Vs. CIT (supra), hence no grievance is left against the order of CIT(A). 6. Second item of disallowance is Job Charges of Rs. 19,26,857/-. 7. The Ld. AR of the assessee has submitted that the disallowance of job charges should be on net based after considering the expenses incurred by the assessee for earning the job charges income. The Ld. AR has relied upon the decision of Hon'ble ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... -. rent and net interest and not gross or net job work receipts Therefore, the decision has no application. This court 111 the case of Commissioner of Income Tax and another Vs M/s. Resonace Laboratories in ITA Nos. 793, 794, 796 & 796/2006, dated 06.06.2012 has taken into consideration the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of M/s Miani Precision Products Pvt. Ltd. vs, The Joint Commissioner of Income Tax and has held that what is :0 be excluded is net receipts and net gross receipts. In view of the afore said decisions, the question of law. IS answered in favour of the revenue and the matter is remanded back to the Assessing Authority to redo the assessment as per the law laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of ACG Associa....