2011 (3) TMI 1810

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....cinta Zimik Vashai, Addl. CIT ORDER MADHAVI DEVI, J. These are the appeals filed by the assessee and the revenue for the asst. year 2005-06 against the order of the CIT(A)-I, Bangalore dated 01.12.2009. 2. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee company is engaged in the business of manufacturing batteries. It filed its return of income for the asst. year 2005-06 declaring a loss....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ed the same as revenue expenditure. The AO asked the assessee to explain as to why the same should not be treated as capital expenditure. 3. The learned counsel for the assessee submitted before the AO that the land was converted into stock-in-trade prior to sale of the land and therefore this expenditure should be allowed as revenue expenditure. However, the AO held it to be capital expenditur....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... find that with regard to the issue of land development expenses, the assessee has all along treated the land as its capital asset and according to the assessee, it is only on 1/4/2004 that the said capital asset has been converted into stock-in-trade. However, we also found that the assessee has itself offered the income from the sale of the land as income from long term capital gain. The assesse....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....eal of the assessee is dismissed. 8. As regards the provision for warranty is concerned, we find that as on 1/4/2004 the available provision was Rs. 19,24,354/- and the warranty expenses incurred in 2004-05 were Rs. 1,15,50,719/- and the warranty for the year is Rs. 96,26,365/- and the difference between these two is Rs. 19,24,354/-. The assessee has made a provision of Rs. 27,20,647/- during t....