Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2021 (4) TMI 959

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....pondent : Mr.R.Vijayaraghavan for M/s.Subbaraya Aiyar Padmanabhan JUDGMENT T.S.SIVAGNANAM, J. This appeal filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('the Act' for brevity) is directed against the order dated 22.12.2020 made in ITA.No.3155/Chny/2019 on the file of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'B' Bench, Chennai ('the Tribunal' ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... applied the decision of the Apex Court in the case of Rotork Control Ltd Vs CIT wherein it was clearly held that expenditure was allowable provided the provisions created was to be scientifically established which is not the case on hand as no details nor evidences were produced by the Assessee to substantiate its claim?" 3. We have heard heard Mrs.R.Hemalatha, learned Senior Standing Counsel ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ia Pvt. Ltd., and dismissed the appeal of the assessee. The learned counsel further relied on the decision of this Court in the case of CIT Vs. Forbes Campbell Finance Ltd., wherein the Division Bench had allowed the Revenue's Appeal. It is further submitted that in the instant case also, there is no scientific basis adopted by the assessee with regard to the provision made for the warranty cl....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... India Pvt. Ltd. 7. In reply, the learned Senior Standing Counsel for the appellant would contend that the decision of this Court in the case of Renowned Auto Products (supra) would bind this Court and the decision of the High Court of Karnataka will not be a binding precedent of this Court. 8. As a general proposition, the learned Senior Standing Counsel is right. However, the thin but mark....