2021 (4) TMI 927

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....stice S.M.Subramaniam For the Petitioner in both WPs : Mr.S.Sathiyanarayanan For the R-1 and R-2 in WP 633/18 : No Appearance For the R-3 and R-4 in WP 633/18 : Mr.V.Ashok Kumar, Central Government Standing Counsel. For the R-1 and R-2 in WP 634/18 : Mr.G.Karthikeyan, Assistant Solicitor General of India. COMMON ORDER The grievance of the writ petitioner is that in respect of pen....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he Revenue Recovery Act and therefore, the proceedings are to be quashed. 4. The learned Assistant Solicitor General of India and the learned Central Government Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents state that certain facts regarding payments made by the petitioner were brought to the notice of the respondents. However, initiation of revenue recovery proceedings are made by fo....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....justment of the amount already paid or full immunity granted by the Settlement Commission, are the disputed facts, which all are to be adjudicated by the Competent Authorities with reference to the documents and the evidences produced by the respective parties. 8. Contrarily, High Court cannot conduct a roving enquiry in order to cull out the truth regarding the transactions done as well as the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nsidered. 11. In view of the facts and circumstances, this Court is inclined to pass the following order:- (a) The respondent-Deputy Director General of Foreign Trade is directed to consider the representation dated 14.02.2017 submitted by the writ petitioner through Registered Post with Acknowledgement Due (RPAD) and dispose of the same on merits and in accordance with law, if necessa....