AI OCR 
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2021 (4) TMI 794
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ng substantial questions of law: " Whether om the facts and circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was right in holding that the expenditure in foreign exchange is to be excluded from both export turnover and total turnover while computing eligible deduction under section 10A of the Income Tax Act?" 3. When the appeal is taken up for hearing,Mr.S. Rajesh, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the appellant fairly submitted that the above question of law is covered by the decision of this Court dated 02.03.2021 made in T.C.A. No.975 of 2010 [The Commissioner of Income Tax - III v. M/s. SRA Systems Ltd., Chennai], wherein this Court held as follows: "... 4.When the appeal is taken up for hearing, Mr.R.Sivaraman, learned cou....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ivery of computer software under Section 10A of the IT Act are allowed only in Export Turnover but not from the Total Turnover then, it would give rise to inadvertent, unlawful, meaningless and illogical result which would cause grave injustice to the Respondent which could have never been the intention of the legislature. 20.Even in the common parlance, when the object of the formula is to arrive at the profit from export business, expenses excluded from export turnover have to be excluded from total turnover also. Otherwise any other interpretation makes the formula unworkable and absurd. Hence, we are satisfied that such deduction shall be allowed from the total turnover in same proportion as well. 21.On the issue of expenses on te....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ble for deduction under Section 10A. Subsequently, a notice dated 22.03.2007 was issued under Section 148 and after giving an opportunity of hearing, the scrutiny assessment order was passed on 17.12.2007, disallowing the entire claim of deduction under Section 10B. Further, the expenditure incurred for the renovation and repairs of the rented premises of the assessee Company was disallowed by the Assessing Officer on the ground that such expenses were in the nature of capital expenditure. The Assessing Officer in his re-assessment order noted that in terms of Section 10B(ii) an undertaking in order to be eligible for deduction under Section 10B must not be formed by splitting up or reconstruction of a business already in existence. Further....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.....A.No.1916 of 2008 and the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court by its judgment dated 26.10.2018 confirmed the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 16.05.2008 made in I.T.A.No.2255/Mds/06 for the Assessment Year 2002-03 and dismissed the appeal. In view of the judgment of the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court, it is clear that the applicability of Clauses (ii) and (iii) of Sub Clause (2) to Section 10B of the Act, the impugned order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal is proper. In view of the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 16.05.2008 in I.T.A.No.2255/Mds/06 and the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court on 26.10.2018 in Tax Case Appeal No.1916 of 2008, the ass....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....essee in a position where it could not claim an deduction under Section 10B as there was no income after set off of carry forward depreciation and unabsorbed depreciation from earlier years. 29.This method of computing the income in the present case made by the Revenue is totally against the said law as has been declared by te Hon'ble Apex Court in the aforesaid decision in Commissioner of Income-tax v. Yokogawa India Ltd., (cited supra). 30.Therefore we have no hesitation to hold that, the decision of the ITAT, which is impugned herein, would not stand in the legal scrutiny, in view of the law having been declared by the Hon'ble Apex Court. Therefore, we are of the view that, the Substantial Question of Law raised in this Appea....