Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Bars
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2021 (4) TMI 723

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....27/03/2015 by the ld. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax-15(3)(1), Mumbai (hereinafter referred to as ld. AO). 2. The first preliminary issue raised by the assessee is with regard to challenging the validity of reopening of assessment for the Asst Year 2007-08 u/s 147 of the Act. 3. We have heard the rival submissions and perused the materials available on record. We find that the assessee company is engaged in the business of marketing, promotion and distribution of 'Red Hat Subscriptions' to customers in Indian Sub-Continent. The assessee basically acts as a distributor of Red Hat Subscription which enables the customers in India to avail the support services for open source software systems. The return of income for the Asst Year 2007-08 w....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....uired u/s 195 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, while making the-payments to the foreign company- Red Hat Asia Singapore Pte. Ltd. Reliance is placed on the rulings of the AAR in the case of Citrix Systems Asia Pacific Pty. Ltd. and Acclerys K K, where it has been decided that the payment by the reseller of the software to its AE is in the nature of royalty within the meaning of section 9(1)(vi) of the Act. Therefore payments made by RHIPL to its AE, Red Hat Asia Singapore Pte. Ltd., should be treated as royalty within the meaning of section 9(l)(vi) of the Act, on which no tax is deducted at source by RHIPL. Accordingly, the expenditure incurred for the purchase of the subscription service for reselling is liable to be disallowed u/s.40(a)(i)....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rt of the assessee in disclosing fully and truly all material facts necessary for the assessment. In the instant case, from the reasons recorded (reproduced hereinabove), it could be seen that there is absolutely no mention of any failure on the part of the assessee in disclosing fully and truly all material facts necessary for the assessment during the original assessment proceedings. Admittedly the original assessment proceedings were completed u/s 143(3) of the Act on 26.11.2009. We find that the law is now very well settled that the reasons recorded by the ld AO for reopening the assessment should duly mention the failure, if any, on the part of the assessee in disclosing full and true information relevant for the assessment if the reop....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....cer has no jurisdiction to issue such notice, contends that even if the words "failure to disclose fully and truly all material facts relevant for assessment for assessment year" are absent in the reasons recorded, still such reasons can be inferred on the text of the reasons recorded. He, therefore, submits that the notice under challenge is well within the scope of section 147 as such this petition is liable to be dismissed being without any substance. Consideration : 17. Having heard the parties at length, we are of the opinion that the petitioner can be disposed of on the first contention raised by the petitioner, wherein the petitioner has contended that the notice issued under section 148 is without jurisdiction being hit by the p....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....." 18. ............. 19. In the case in hand it is not in dispute that the assessment year involved is 1996-97. The last date of the said assessment year was 31st March, 1997 and from that date if four years are counted, the period of four years expired on 1st March, 2001. The notice issued is dated 5th November, 2002 and received by the assessee on 7th November, 2002. Under these circumstances, the notice is clearly beyond the period of four years. 20. The reasons recorded by the Assessing Officer nowhere state that there was failure on the part of the assessee to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for the assessment of that assessment year. It is needless to mention that the reasons are required to be read as th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rary reopening of the concluded assessment. The reasons recorded by the Assessing Officer cannot be supplemented by filing affidavit or making oral submission, otherwise, the reasons which were lacking in the material particulars would get supplemented, by the time the matter reaches to the Court, on the strength of affidavit or oral submissions advanced. (emphasis supplied by us herein) 21. Having recorded our finding that the impugned notice itself is beyond the period of four years from the end of the assessment year 1996-97 and does not comply with the requirements of proviso to section 147 of the Act, the Assessing Officer had no jurisdiction to reopen the assessment proceedings which were concluded on the basis of assessment under....