2011 (12) TMI 749

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....R A.N. Pahuja : This appeal filed on 11.11.2010 by the Revenue against an order dated 03-08-2010 of the ld. CIT (Appeals)-XXI, New Delhi for the Assessment Year 2007-08, raises the following grounds :- "1. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in allowing relief to the assessee by claiming that exemption u/s 11 of the I.T. Act is entitled to both relig....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Bar Council of Mahrashtra,130 ITR 28(SC);R.K. Garg vs. Union of India,133 ITR 239(SC);State of Kerala Vs. M.P. Shanti Verma Jain (1998) 231 ITR 787 (S.C.) and Gulam Mohidin Trust Vs. CIT (2000) 248 ITR 587 (J&K), the AO concluded that the assessee society violated the provisions of sec. 13(1)(b) of the Act and accordingly, denied the claim for exemption u/s 11 of the Act.. 3. On appeal, the le....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....assessee for exemption u/s 11 of the Act. Following these decisions, claim was also allowed in decision dated 18.6.2009 for the AY 2005-06 in ITA no.45/Del./2009. Recently, the ITAT, vide their order dated 26.12.2011 in ITA no.4671/Del./2011 for the AY 2008-09, following the aforesaid decision dated 18.6.2009 for the AY 2005-06, allowed `the claim for exemption u/s 11 of the Act. 5.1 Since the ....