Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2021 (4) TMI 662

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... in law, the Ld. CIT(A) erred in restricting the addition of Rs. 5,21,52,147/- to 52,15,215/- as estimate on profit on the bogus purchase. 2. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in not appreciating the f act that the Managing Director has admitted to the fact that the assessee is involved in taking accommodation entries for bogus purchases. 3. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Hon'ble Ld. CIT(A) has erred in deleting the disallowance made by the AO overlooking the explicit finding of the investigation carried out by the Sales Tax Department and corroborated by the enquiries of the AO. 4. The appellant craves leave to amend or alter ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e information submitted by the parties were not complete with respect to the genuineness of purchase transactions. Considering the overall material facts and information filed and the statement recorded, the A.O found that the onus lies on the assessee to prove the genuineness of purchases. Finally, the A.O considered the facts of bogus purchases bills and is of the view that the parties referred in the website of Maharashtra Sales Tax Department are hawala operators, therefore made an addition along with other additions and assessed the total income of Rs. 9,18,80,807/- and passed the order u/s 143(3) r.w.s 147 dated 26.11.2016. 3. Aggrieved by the order, the assessee has filed an appeal with the CIT(A). The Ld. CIT(A) considered the su....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....and gone through the facts and circumstances of the case. Before us, the leaned Counsel for the assessee filed a comparative statement of cross profit and net profit ratio for many years which is as under: - Comparative statement of gross profit and net profit ratios Income Turnover 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 Sales 81,470,952 103,613,890 44,470,801 64,956,690 65,574,370 Income/ Decreases in Stock 39,201,816 1,667,781 25,923,445 13,613,129 72,276,896 Gross Profit Turnover. Bogus purchases allowed As expenses 52.20% 48.48% 51.94% 35.52% 40.98% Net Profit/Turnover Bogus purchases allowed expenses 5.36% 5.83% 4.27% 3.90% 9.85% The learned C....