Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1987 (7) TMI 37

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e Revenue to decide the following question of law, namely: " Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was legally justified in directing the passing of two separate assessments, one for pre-change and the other for post-change period specially when the Tribunal has held that it is a case of change in the constitution of the firm within the meaning of section 187(2)....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....this ultimate direction, the Revenue has come up in reference to this court. It is obvious that the Tribunal having held that it is a case of mere change in the constitution of the firm and not of succession, it had to logically flow from this finding that it is a case governed by section 187 of the Act and the income for the two periods had to be clubbed together for making one assessment. Obvio....