Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2021 (4) TMI 429

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Brief facts are that the appellant filed 5 Bills of Entry for the import of "Digitizer" under CTH 90221490 without availing the benefit of Notification No. 12/2012-CE (Sl. No. 312). They filed a letter dated 29.6.2016 requesting the Assistant Commissioner to reassess the bills of entry after extending the benefit of the above Notification. The said request was rejected by the Assistant Commissio....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....before the Tribunal. 2. On behalf of the appellant, ld. Counsel Dr.S. Krishnanandh appeared and argued the matter. He submitted that the appellant had requested for reassessment of the bills of entry and had also filed an appeal since such requested was rejected. It can be sufficiently noted that the duty was paid under protest. Therefore, the limitation prescribed under section 27(2) of the Cust....