Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2021 (4) TMI 349

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... are registered with the Department for providing services under the category of Information Technology Software Services. During the course of audit conducted on the records of the appellant covering the period from April 2011 to March 2015, it was observed that the appellant had wrongly availed service tax credit on services not used for providing output service as detailed in the table below :- Period involved CENVAT Credit availed on input Amount April 2014 to March 2015 Vending Machine, Pooja expenses, supply of plants, garden maintenance and parking fee 1,53,256/- March 2015 Civil interior works and electrical works undertaken to their office building 17,78,385/- April to June 2015 Civil interior works....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... relating to wrong availment of service tax credit on services not used for providing output service during the relevant period would have gone unnoticed." The learned counsel further submitted that during the audit itself, the appellant accepted the objection of the audit party and the cenvat credit on disputed services was duly reversed. She further submitted that Department was not able to bring any material on record showing that the appellant has suppressed the material with intent to evade the tax. She further submitted that the decision of this Tribunal in the case of YCH Logistics (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. CCE,Cus.&ST, Bangalore-I [2020(43) GSTL 518 (Tri. Bang.)] has dropped the penalty under Sections 77 and 78 on identical facts. She s....