TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2021 (4) TMI 211
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....43(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short 'the Act'). 2. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee filed its return of income for the assessment year under consideration declaring total income of Rs. 57,18,540/-. Since the case was selected for scrutiny, the AO issued notice u/s. 143(2) on 7.8.2013 and notice u/s. 142(1) on 30.9.2014. In response thereof, the authorized representative of the assessee attended the proceedings from time to time and furnished the requisite details. The AO completed the assessment u/s. 143(3) of the Act determining the total income of the assessee at Rs. 3,33,29,399/- inter alia making addition of Rs. 1,68,26,186/- on account of the contribution made by the assessee to the unapproved provide....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....se (f) of section 43B. However, the leave salary was not actually paid to the employees which does not amount to payment to an employee. 4. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in deleting the addition without discussing the merits of the issue involved and by relying only on previous order of CIT(A) in case of the assessee, which were also not accepted by the department but further appeal could not be preferred due to the tax effect, which was less than the prescribed monetary limits. 5. The appellant craves to leave to add or amend any grounds of appeal before the appeal is heard or disposed off. 6. It is prayed that the order of the Ld. CIT(A) be cancelled and that of the assessing officer may....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....order dated 09.06.2020 w.e.f. 28.02.2012. 4. So far as the addition on account of disallowance of Leave Salary Contribution is concerned, the Ld. Counsel submitted that Ld. CIT(A) has deleted the said addition by following his own order dated 22.07.2019 passed in assessee's appeal No. 03/16-17 for the assessment year 2013-14. The Ld. Counsel further submitted that both the issues are covered in favour of the assessee by the decision of the Chandigarh Bench of the Tribunal rendered in the case of H.P. State Industrial Corporation Ltd. vs. The ACIT Circle Shimla, ITA No. 1308/Chd/2012 for the Assessment year 2009-10 and since the order passed by the Ld. CIT(A) is in accordance with the decision of the Chandigarh Bench of the Tribunal, th....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ntention of the Ld. Counsel for the assessee that the ground raised by the Revenue is covered in favour of the assessee by the order of the co-ordinate Bench of the Tribunal. Accordingly, we uphold the findings of the Ld. CIT(A) and dismiss this ground of appeal of the Revenue. 6. The second issue relates to disallowance of premium paid towards leave encashment scheme. We notice that during the year relevant to the assessment year under consideration, the assessee made payment Rs. 91,13,601/- by creating LIC based fund. The AO made addition of the said amount on the ground that no actual payment was made to any employee. However, in the first appeal, the Ld. CIT(A) has allowed this ground of appeal by taking into consideration the fact tha....