2021 (3) TMI 913
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e prayed for the following reliefs: "A. This Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ of certiorari or a writ in nature of certiorari or any other appropriate writ or order quashing and setting aside impugned order dated 11.11.2019 (annexed at Annexure A) passed by the 2nd respondent authority; B. Pending notice, admission and final hearing of this petition, this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to stay the operation and implementation of the impugned order dated 11.11.2019 (annexed at Annexure A); C. Ex parte ad interim relief in terms of prayer B may kindly be granted. D. Such further relief(s) as deemed fit in the facts and circumstances of the case may kindly be granted in the interest of just....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... from the office of the consultant appeared before the authority on 16th September 2019. Short letter was submitted mentioning the broad grounds of defence and requesting for opportunity to offer explanation in details since the matter involved issues of computation rather than the legal issues. 7. Thereafter, on 16th October 2019, the advocate of the writ applicants appeared and submitted various documents. The entire matter was regarding the reconciliation between the books of accounts and returns of the writ applicants and therefore, again, a request was made for opportunity of hearing since the reconciliation would have to be explained in details. The writ applicants were in fact ready to offer explanation then and there itself. Howe....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....cating authority. It is submitted that at the most, the writ applicants may be asked to make pre-deposit of 7.5% of tax demand as per Section 83 of the Finance Act read with Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and the matter may be remanded on the basis of such condition. Reliance is placed on the decision of this Court in the case of Neptune Reality Pvt Ltd. vs. Principal Commissioner [Special Civil Application No.22536 of 2017 decided on 5th April 2018]. 10. On the other hand, Mr. Raval the learned Senior Standing Counsel vehemently opposed this writ application and submitted that ample opportunity was given to the writ applicant to make good their case before the respondent No.2. Mr. Raval invited the attention of this Court t....
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
TaxTMI