Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2021 (3) TMI 622

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....T(A) is contrary to law, facts and circumstances of the case. 2. The Ld. CIT(A) erred in giving relief to the assessee by deleting the disallowance of Rs. 44,22,711/- for AY 2013-14 & Rs. 45,56,529/- for AY 2014-15 claimed under section 36( 1 )(iii) when the assessee company has not produced any evidence regarding the transaction for validating the claim that it arose out of a family settlement during FY 2007-08 during the assessment proceedings. The Ld. CIT(A) erred in not giving opportunity to the AO under Rule 46A for verifying the claim of the impugned family settlement during appellate proceedings. 3. The Ld. CIT(A) failed to appreciate the assessee was not able to establish the nexus between the business and the loans and the im....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....debited interest, the Assessing Officer worked out proportionate interest to be disallowed under section 36(1)(iii) of the Act at Rs. 44,22,711/- and brought to tax. On appeal, the ld. CIT(A) deleted the disallowance. 3. Aggrieved, the Revenue is in appeal before the Tribunal. The ld. DR submitted that during the course of appellate proceedings, by considering the submissions and evidence on the transaction for validating the claim that transaction arose out of a family settlement during the financial year 2007- 08, the ld. CIT(A) deleted the disallowance made under section 36(1)(iii) of the Act without giving an opportunity to the Assessing Officer, which is in violation of the Rule 46A and pleaded for setting aside the appellate order. O....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....f Rs. 2.16 crores. The assessee has not registered the sale deed. Thus, the assessee was sought for to submit the guideline value adopted in the computation, which was submitted by the assessee as of and valid between 01.08.2007 to 31.03.2012 for the survey numbered plots for which the sales took place during the above period with the valuation ranging from Rs. 500 per sq. ft. to Rs. 750 sq.ft. However, after noticing from the website, the revised guideline values after 01.04.2012 @ Rs. 3000 per sq. ft. for the above said plots sold, the Assessing Officer determined the consideration at Rs. 3,96,00,000/- [3300 x 4 plots x 3000] and Rs. 4,75,20,000/- [3960 sq. ft. x 4 plots x Rs. 3000] and arrived the capital gains at Rs. 8,54,21,990/-. Acco....