2021 (3) TMI 598
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ng on behalf of the State. 3. This criminal revision application is directed against the order dated 12.6.2013 in Cr. Appeal No.95/2012 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge - III, East Singhbhum, Jamshedpur, whereby the judgment of conviction and order of sentence passed on 10.04.2012 by learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Jamshedpur in C/1 Case No.106/2010 in which the petitioner was directed to undergo S.I for six months and to pay a compensation amount of Rs. 1.50 lakhs to the complainant - opposite party no.2 under Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act, has been confirmed. 4. As per the office report, an amount of Rs. 1,50,000/- has been credited in the account of this Court by virtue of cheque no.031167 dated 16.12.2020....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... no.2 and for repayment of the aforesaid amount, the petitioner had issued a cheque of that amount in favour of the opposite party no.2 on 13.11.2009 and the same got dishonored with a note "refer to Drawer" as per return memo dated 23.11.2009. The opposite party no.2 sent a legal demand notice by registered post to the petitioner on 17.12.2009 demanding the said cheque amount of Rs. 1,50,000/-, but even then, the petitioner did not give the cheque amount to the complainant. Thereafter, the opposite party no.2 filed a complaint petition bearing C/1 Case No.106 of 2010/ T.R. No.116 of 2012 before the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Jamshedpur. 8. The learned trial court convicted the petitioner under Section 138 of Negotiable Instru....
TaxTMI
TaxTMI