Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2021 (3) TMI 204

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....or the Respondent. ORDER We have heard both the parties. The applicant has filed the present application on 12th June 2020 wherein the following questions have been raised : - Q1. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, whether the Dividend distribution tax ('DDT') paid/payable by Comstar Automotive Technologies Private Limited (Comstar or the Applicant or the Company) unde....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....re Topco and Comstar Mauritius are beneficial owners of the dividend income received from the Applicant as provided under Article 10 ('Dividends') of the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement ('DTAA') entered into between India and Singapore ('India-Singapore DTAA') and under Article 10 of the DTAA entered into between India and Mauritius ('India-Mauritius DTAA'). Q4 &n....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he Revenue is that the transaction was designed prima-facie for avoidance of tax. It has been submitted that as per provision of Section 115-O of the Act, DDT is an incidence of tax on the company and not on the shareholder. Therefore, the applicant is not entitled to take benefit of the provisons of DTAA. The Ld. AR submitted that the objection of the Department is on the merits of the case and t....