2018 (8) TMI 2018

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... by accused/appellant Sh. G.D Kataria(in short appellant) against the respondent M/s AVL Leasing & Finance Ltd through its AR Sh. Rajesh Ahuja (in short respondent). 2. The appellant has challenged judgment of conviction dated 26.04.2018 vide which accused was convicted for the offence punishable under section 138 of Negotiable Act, 1881 (in short N.I Act) and also challenging the order on poin....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Ms. T. Priyadarshini, Ld. MM01( NI Act), West District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi (in short Ld. Trial Court). 4. The main grounds taken by appellant while challenging the abovementioned impugned judgment of conviction and order on point of sentence are mainly to the effect that impugned judgment of conviction and order on point of sentence were passed by Ld. Trial Court without appreciating the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....y Ld. Trial Court after properly appreciating the facts and circumstances of this case ; that cheques in question were handed over by appellant to the respondent side towards legal enforeable liability and the same were dishonoured when presented for encashment ; that entire facts and material on record were correctly and properly appreciated by Ld. Trial Court before passing impugned judgment of ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nt was liable for commission of offence under section 138 of NI Act. The appellant did not produce relevant/satisfactory evidence before Ld. Trial Court in support of the fact that he was not responsible towards respondent side for any amount of money qua this matter as per relevant provisions of NI Act. 8. For these reasons, in the considered opinion of this Court, there is no merit in this ap....