2021 (2) TMI 646
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... NATARAJ RANGASWAMY APPELLANTS (BY SRI. JEEVAN J. NEERALGI, ADV.,) RESPONDENT (BY SMT. R. PRATIBHA, ADV., FOR SRI. S. PARTHASARATHI, ADV.,) JUDGMENT ALOK ARADHE J. This appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act for short) has been preferred by the revenue. The subject matter of the appeal pertains to the Assessment year 2009-10.....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ore than Rs. 10 lakhs and as such appeals were maintainable before tribunal?". 2. Facts leading to filing of this appeal briefly stated are that the assessee is a co-operative society. The assessee filed the return of income for the Assessment Year 2009-10. The Assessing Authority by an order dated 30.12.2011 made disallowances relating to provision of gold theft, wage reversion and audit fees ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... 3. Learned counsel for the revenue while inviting the attention of this court to para 4 of the Circular No.21/2015 submitted that where the returned loss is reduced or assessed as income, the tax effect would include notional tax on disputed additions and the Assessing Authority had made disallowances with regard to the provisions of wage reversion to the extent of Rs. 9,84,29,827/- as well as p....
TaxTMI