Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2021 (2) TMI 421

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....of taxable total income without assigning proper reasons and justification. 3. The CIT (Appeals) failed to appreciate that the assessment of licence income earned under the head 'income from house property' was wrong, erroneous, unjustified, incorrect and not sustainable in law. 4. The CIT (Appeals) failed to appreciate that the misreading of the business structure of the Appellant as well as further misreading of the MOU would vitiate the decision rendered in sustaining the assessment of licence income under the head 'income from house property' and ought to have appreciated that the principles laid down by the Apex Court referred to in her appellate/impugned order were completely distorted while vitiating the tangential findings for sustaining the assessment of licence income under the head 'income from house property'. 5. The CIT(Appeals) failed to appreciate that the consistency of reporting of such income and the assessment of such income in the earlier assessment years was completely overlooked and brushed aside. 6. The CIT(Appeals) failed to appreciate that the entire computation of taxable total income on various facets was wrong, erroneous, unjustified, incorre....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....a hotel, the license fees does not include all the streams of revenue earned by M/s.Oriental Hotels Ltd. Therefore, he opined that income derived from licensing the hotel to Oriental Hotels Ltd., is nothing but rental income which is assessable under the head 'Income from House Property' and accordingly by following decision of ITAT, Cochin Bench in the case of Palmshore Hotels (P.) Ltd vs. ACIT, (2012) 28 taxmann.com 156, assessed the income derived from letting out hotel premises under the head 'Income from other sources'. 4. Being aggrieved by the assessment order, the assessee preferred an appeal before the CIT(A). Before the CIT(A), the assessee reiterated its submissions made before the AO and argued that it has licensed a fully furnished five star hotel comprising of 125 guest rooms on revenue sharing basis and hence revenues derived from leasing, to run a hotel is assessable under the head 'Income from business or profession' but not under the head 'Income from house property', as considered by the ld.AO. The assessee further submitted that the decision relied upon by the AO in the case of Palmshore Hotels (P) Ltd., has been reversed by the Hon'ble High Court of Kerala and....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ssessed under the head 'income from house property'. In this regard, he relied upon the decision of Hon'ble High Court of Kerala in the case of Palmshore Hotels (P.) Ltd., vs. CIT, (2017) 252 taxman 191 (Kerala). 6. The ld.DR, on the other hand strongly supporting order of the CIT(A) submitted that facts brought out by the authorities clearly indicate that the assessee has leased out hotel premises for an annual rental income which was quantified on the basis of percentage of gross revenue earned by the lessor M/s. Oriental Hotels Ltd., and hence, merely because the nomenclature was changed in the Memorandum of Understanding and license fees was determined in a different manner, the nature of income which is assessable under the head 'income from house property' cannot be changed to another head of income. 7 We have heard both the parties, perused the materials available on record and gone through the orders of the authorities below. The solitary issue that came up for our consideration from the given facts and circumstance of the case is, whether license received for licensing a hotel to another company for running and maintenance is assessable under the head 'income from busine....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....come is assessable. Further, after considering the facts of those case, the Hon'ble Supreme court came to the conclusion that if the main object of the assessee is letting out a premises on rent, then such income is assessable under the head 'income from business or profession'. In this case, on perusal of main objects of the assessee, which was extracted by the ld.AO in his order on page 3, we find that clause-3 of main object specifies that the assessee is engaged in the business of 'to build, make construct, purchase, equip, maintain and improve, alter lease and work, etc., which means the main objects clause of the assessee company permits constructing a hotel and leasing them on rent. Even on this count, the conclusion arrived at by the AO and the CIT(A) is contrary to the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Chennai Properties and Investments Ltd. Be it as it may. But, the case of the assessee is squarely covered by the decision of the Hon'ble High Court of Kerala in the case of M/s.Palmshore Hotels (P) Ltd vs. CIT, supra, where the Hon'ble High Court of Kerala has reversed the decision of ITAT, Cochin, which was heavily relied upon by the AO to justify h....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ndia, Kerala Hotel and Restaurant Association etc. will be in the name of the licensor. Similarly, provision is also made to clarify that the provisions of the agreement shall not be construed as creating a partnership or joint venture or managing/selling agency or any other relationship except a licence. In Article XIV of the agreement, it is specifically provided that during the term of the agreement, the hotel shall be known as and designated by the logo and name Hotel Palmshore, which will be suffixed by the words "An Abad Beach Resort" -along with Abad logo. The provisions of the agreement also indicate that the licensor has the right of supervisory control in the manner in which the hotel is operated. All these, provisions of the agreement would, therefore, indicate that the licence that has been granted is that of a fully established running hotel authorising the licensee to operate the hotel for a specified period subject to the terms and conditions incorporated therein. Therefore, the license granted is that of a business. These facts would, therefore, clearly indicate that the intention of the parties as reflected in the agreement was to grant licence in respect of a runn....