Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1988 (12) TMI 93

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....is reference raises only one question of law at the instance of the assessee. The question reads thus : "Whether, in the absence of any specific rule under the Gift-tax Act providing for the manner of valuation of unquoted equity shares, the Tribunal was in error in looking into rule ID of the Wealth-tax Rules, 1957, as a guide for the purposes of ascertaining, in accordance with the recognised....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... basis of the value determined by the valuers for wealth-tax purposes in terms of section 24(6) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957, in the case of the Trustees of Maithili Family Trust for the assessment year 1967-68. The departmental authorities as well as the Tribunal held that the fair market value of the unquoted shares was required to be computed in accordance with rule ID of the Wealth-tax Rules. I....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e fact that the assessment years 1957-58 and 1958-59 were involved in that case was not relevant. He pointed out that following its said decision, the Supreme Court, in a recent decision in CGT v. Smt. Kusumben D. Mahadevia [1980] 122 ITR 38, in terms, held that in the case of a company shares of which are not quoted at the stock exchange, shares need not be valued on the break-up method in terms ....