Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1988 (11) TMI 62

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....f the assessee reads thus : "Whether an appeal lies against an order charging interest of Rs. 11,475 under proviso (iii) to section 139(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, to the Appellate Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax ?" The facts are admitted. The assessment of the assessee, a registered firm, for the assessment year 1966-67 was completed on a total income of Rs. 98,445. Besides determining....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....IT [1965] 56 ITR 269 and held that the appeal against levy of interest under proviso (iii) to section 139(1) was not competent. Further appeal of the assessee to the Tribunal met the same fate. Placing reliance on the Supreme Court's decision in the case of Central Provinces Manganese Ore Co. Ltd. v. CIT [1986] 160 ITR 961, Shri Rajagopal, learned counsel for the assessee, submitted that levy of ....