2021 (1) TMI 685

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d representative appeared before the Tribunal on the above date. Therefore, considering the non-compliance by the assessee, we are proceeding to dispose off this appeal after examining the materials available on record and after hearing the Ld. Departmental Representative (DR). 2. The grounds of appeal filed by the revenue read as under : 1. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A)has erred in upholding only 30% addition of Rs. 2,66,147/- on the bogus purchases in the case of purchase from Goodluck Impex and Suraj Steel as against the AO's stand of disallowing 100% of the bogus purchases, ignoring the fact that the action of the Assessing Officer was only based on credible information received from the Ma....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tment made an addition of Rs. 2,66,147/-. 4. Aggrieved by the order of the AO, the assessee filed an appeal before the Ld. CIT(A). We find that vide order dated 05.04.2019, the Ld. CIT(A) held that : "10.2 On the addition of Rs. 2,92,829/- in case of Suraj Steel and Goodluck Impex where there was information from Sales Tax and notices u/s 133(6) were also returned back, it has been submitted by the appellant that all relevant details like copies of bills, bank statement and delivery challans were filed. Regarding Shree Sai Wirenetting where notices u/s 133(6) returned back, it was submitted that this was a genuine party not appearing in the list of Sales Tax Department. In my considered view, once the AO is unable to verify the transa....