Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2010 (4) TMI 1221

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he Respondent : Shri Vijay Mehta. ORDER Per J. Sudhakar Reddy, A.M. This is an appeal filed by the Revenue directed against the order of the CIT(Appeals)-VI, Mumbai dated 26-03-2009 for the assessment year 2006-07 on the following grounds : 1. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) erred in directing the Assessing Officer to accept the revise....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Officer be restored. 5. The appellant craves leave to amend or alter any ground or add a new ground which may be necessary. 2. Facts in brief: The assessee is a company and is engaged in the business of manufacturing and marketing of ethical pharmaceutical formulation. The return of Fringe Benefit Tax (FBT) was filed, declaring value of FBT at Rs. 1,25,69,110 and paid taxes accordi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Manvendra Goyal, learned DR and Mr. Vijay Mehta, learned counsel for the assessee. 4. The jurisdictional High Court in I.T. Appeal No. 217 of 2001 in the case of Mr. Balkumund Acharya )Prop. Laxmi General supply Company) vs. DCIT vide judgment dated 19th Dec., 2008 at para 31,32,33 on pages 18 & 19 held as follow : "31. Having said so, we must observe that the Apex Court and the vari....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....his Court in the case of Nirmala L. Mehta v. A. Balasubramaniam, C.I.T. (2004) 269 ITR 1 has held that there cannot be any estoppel against the statute. Article 265 of the Constitution of India in unmistakable terms provides that no tax shall be levied or collected except by authority of law. Acquiescence cannot take away from a party the relief that he is entitled to where the tax is levied or co....