2021 (1) TMI 280

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....fficer. 2. Briefly stated the facts are that, assessee engaged in the business of Trading and Manufacturing of Dyes and Chemicals, filed return of income on 30.09.2009 and 30.09.2010 declaring income of Rs..3,59,480/- and Rs..4,36,614/- for the A.Ys., 2009-10 and A.Y. 2010-11 respectively. Assessee filed revised return on 30.09.2009 and 25.01.2011 declaring income of Rs..3,59,480/- and Rs..4,48,261/- for the A.Ys., 2009-10 and A.Y.2010-11 respectively and the returns were processed u/s. 143(1) of the Act. Subsequently, Assessing Officer received information from the DGIT (Inv.,), Mumbai about the accommodation entries provided by various dealers and assessee was also one of the beneficiary from those dealers. The assessments were reop....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e parties before the Assessing Officer. Therefore, Assessing Officer treated 25% of the alleged bogus purchases of Rs..22,34,917/- and Rs..18,32,734/- for the A.Y. 2009-10 and A.Y. 2010-11 respectively as non-genuine and added to the income of the assessee. On appeal the Ld.CIT(A) considering the evidences and various submissions of the assessee restricted the disallowance to an extent of 12.5% of the non-genuine purchases. 4. Inspite of issue of notice none appeared on behalf of the assessee nor any adjournment was sought by the assessee. Therefore, I proceed to dispose off these appeals on hearing the Ld. DR on merits. 5. Ld. DR vehemently supported the orders of the Assessing Officer. 6. Heard Ld. DR, perused the orders of the a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tel Pvt. Ltd vs. CIT Central-1 in ITA No. 964/M/2015 darted 19.06.2015). 5.6. In view of the above, it is an admitted fact that Sales Tax Department has conducted search and seizure operation and has established large number of companies/firms/partnership concerns as hawala dealers who are engaged in accommodation entries without actually supplying the goods. The appellant is one of the beneficiary and has received such accommodation bills from two of the hawala operators totaling to Rs. 22,34,917/-. The A.O. attempted to verify such parties by making independent enquiries u/s. 133(6) of the I.T.Act, 1961. All these verification letters came back "Left" or "not known". The appellant filed certain details such as purchase bills, led....