Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2021 (1) TMI 273

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t Company') invoking the provision of Section 252 of the Companies Act, 2013 for restoration of the name of the Appellant Company in the register maintained by the Registrar of Companies, NCT of Delhi and Haryana (RoC). 2.  As per the averments, M/s. Delhi Design Tech Private Ltd was incorporated as Private Company Limited by shares on 25.08.1995 with CIN No. U74899DL1995PTC071973 and having its registered office at Village and Post Office Rajokari, Delhi, South West Delhi - 110018, within the jurisdiction of this Tribunal. 3.  It is submitted by the Appellant Company that as per the Memorandum of its Association, its main objects are : "to buy, sell, import, export, contract, distribute in India or  abroad....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....sp; Copy of the Income Tax Return for the year 2006-07. d)  Copy of the Bank Statement issued by Allahabad Bank for the period from 13.08.2010 to 31.12.2019 6.  That the Income Tax Department has filed its reply and submitted  that as per there e-filling database of the Assessee, no ITR was e-filled by the assessee against the aforesaid allotted PAN. 7.  The ROC, who filed its report, has made the following observation: "6) That the Respondent most respectfully submits that the action of striking off of the present Company was legal and justified and was the result of the operation of the law, as the company was not carrying on any operations for a period of two immediately preceding financial yea....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r the date of striking off. Other than that no additional evidence has been placed on record, which could depict that the company was in operation or carrying out business as per its objects. Also, the Appellant Company failed to produce any document in support of utilization of plot on lease by RIICO Ltd. 11.  That the provisions pertaining to restoration of the name of the Company are provided in the Section 252(3) of the Companies Act, 2013, which, inter alia, includes that if a company is carrying out its business or in operation or otherwise it is just that the name of the company be restored, this Tribunal can order the RoC to restore the name of the company in the Register of Companies. 12.  There is nothing placed on....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....assed by learned counsel for the Appellant that inspite of Appellant's inability to demonstrate that the Company was at the relevant time carrying on business or in operation, the Tribunal had vast powers to order restoration of Company on the ground "or otherwise". This term "or otherwise" has been judiciously used by the legislature to arm the Tribunal to order restoration of a struck off company within the  permissible time limit to take care of situations where it would be just and fair to restore company in the interest  of company and other stakeholders. Such instances can be innumerable. However, this term "or otherwise" cannot be interpreted in a manner that makes room for arbitrary exercise of power by the Tribunal wh....