Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

1939 (9) TMI 9

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the locality who were taking interest in the said mosque and contributing to its upkeep. There is no deed of foundation prescribing any rules for the management of the affairs of the mosque or for the appointment of a muthavalli or any servant of the mosque. From a document of 1863 (Ex. VII), it is evident that there was a muthavalli to the mosque and he was one Kasim Ali who was maternal grandfather of the defendant. Kasim Ali appears to have died in 1888. The defendant states that a year before his death the said Kasim Ali executed a will (Ex. I) in favour of the defendant in and by which he appointed the defendant as the muthavalli and on the death of Kasim Ali in pursuance of the will the defendant succeeded to the office of muthavalli and was functioning as such. It appears from the evidence that Kasim Ali was the Pesh Imam of the mosque and on his death the defendant continued to be the Pesh Imam and was doing the duties as such till the date of suit. The genuineness of Ex. I is challenged by the plaintiff. The learned City Civil Judge did not record any finding in regard to it but in a later suit between the parties it was found not to be genuine. It is no doubt a document ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....erning body of the society. Accordingly a society was formed and registered under the name and style of Masjiday Mahmood Jamait Managing Committee with twelve members, the defendant being one of them. It was registered on 2nd December, 1918. The memorandum of association is marked as Ex. A-2 in the case and the rules and bye-laws as Ex. A-3., It is clear from them that one of the main objects of the association was to conduct the affairs of the mosque by collecting subscriptions, pay the salaries of the servants and incur expenses for the upkeep of the mosque and do everything which a manager of a mosque is required to do. From the date of the incorporation down to the date of the suit the said society was in undisputed management of the affairs of the mosque and the defendant ceased to function as muthavalli. It was the society that was collecting subscriptions, paying salaries of the Pesh Imam, Muzzein Sahib and the sweeper and directing the performance of the services in the mosque and paying taxes, effecting repairs and generally doing everything which a manager or a muthavalli of a mosque would do. The defendant was only acting as a Pesh Imam under directions given by the soci....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....fendant not having exercised the management for a period of six years from 1918 his rights as muthavalli, if any, were lost, that he accepted the subordinate position of a servant under the mosque while continuing to be a member of the Committee and that he is estopped from; questioning the right of the plaintiff to manage the mosque. On the evidence the learned City Civil Judge came to the conclusion that the plaintiff society was properly registered under Act XXI of 1860, that the defendant lost his rights as muthavalli and that the plaintiff would therefore be entitled to the injunction prayed for. 2. The main ground on which Mr. Rajah Aiyar the counsel for the defendant-appellant assailed the decision of the learned City Civil Judge is that the plaintiff society is not competent to sue for or claim the relief sought in the plaint. He formulated his contention thus : (1) the society was a religious society and therefore incapable of incorporation under the Societies Registration Act as only charitable societies could be incorporated thereunder; and (2) even if the society was a validly incorporated society it could not acquire by prescription the office of muthavalli, as the ri....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....of public worship or providing or maintaining a place of public worship would be a charitable purpose and a society formed for such a purpose would be a charitable society. According to that law therefore a religious society would be a charitable society, the only condition required was that it should be for the benefit of the public. Most of the enactments relating to that period were framed by4 English lawyers well conversant with English law. The Indian enactments which related to the charitable and religious endowments before 1860 were the Bengal, Bombay and Madras Regulations, the Madras Regulation being Regulation VII of 1817. In the heading of the Madras Regulation, the language used is "for the support of the mosques, Hindu temples and colleges or other public purposes" and in the preamble "for the support of mosques, Hindu temples, colleges and choultries, and for other, pious and beneficial purposes." It will be seen from the context that the words 'public' and 'pious' were meant to connote both religious and charitable institutions. In.1817 according to the law of England public purposes connoted charitable purposes including religious....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....society cannot render the society, a society formed for religious purposes. The society concerns itself only with the management of the secular affairs of the institution. So far s religious services are concerned which only consist in the recitation of prayers in the mosque, they are done through the Pesh Inam who is paid a salary. What the society does' is what exactly a muthavalli could have done and a muthavalli is only concerned, with the management of the secular affairs of the mosque. The society itself does not concern itself with the performance of prayers. There can therefore be no doubt that the paramount object of the society is charitable and therefore the fact that one of the purposes is the management of the affairs of the mosque cannot take away from it the character of the society as a charitable society., We are therefore of the opinion that the plaintiff's society is a charitable society within the meaning of the Act and the registration thereunder is perfectly legal and valid. 4. In regard to the second point that the plaintiff's society has not acquired right of management we are equally of the opinion that it is also untenable. A muthavalli accord....