Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2020 (12) TMI 1142

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... : Sri.Priyadarshi Mishra, JCIT-DR ORDER PER GEORGE GEORGE K, JM : This appeal at the instance of the assessee is directed against CIT(A)'s order dated 10.06.2019. The relevant assessment year is 2016-2017. 2. The solitary issue raised is whether the CIT(A) was justified in confirming the A.O.'s further disallowance of Rs. 66,830, u/s 14A r.w.r. 8D(2)(ii) of the I.T.Rules (assessee had....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....wherein the A.O. had made an additional disallowance of Rs. 66,813 under the provisions of section 14A of the I.T.Act r.w.r. 8D(2)(ii) of the I.T.Rules. In doing so, the Assessing Officer rejected the contentions of the assessee that no portion of the borrowed funds was utilized for the purpose of investment and the assessee was having sufficient own interest free funds to cover up for the investm....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d by the order of the CIT(A), the assessee has filed this appeal before the Tribunal. The learned Counsel for the assessee has filed a paper book enclosing therein the balance sheet, the profit and loss account along with the schedules and the notes on accounts, for the year ending 31.03.2016. The learned AR reiterated the submissions made before the Income Tax Authorities. 7. The learned Depar....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....The Hon'ble jurisdictional High Court in the case of CIT v. Microlabs Ltd. [(2016) 383 ITR 490 (Kar.)] had held that even in a situation where investments are from common pool, if non-interest bearing funds are more than the investments in tax free securities, no disallowance can be made u/s 14A of the I.T.Act r.w.r. 8D(2)(ii) of the I.T.Rules. The Hon'ble jurisdictional High Court while laying do....