Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

1989 (2) TMI 53

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ation for the assessment year 1970-71. The Revenue challenged the registration on the basis that the so-called sub-partnership was not genuine. Ultimately, the matter came to this court in Income-tax Reference No. 45 of 1975 and it was held that the sub-partnership between Kanhya Lal and Ram Chand was not genuine and thus was not entitled to registration. This case is reported as CIT v. Kanhayalal....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e Tribunal to refer the following question: "Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in view of the opinion of the High Court in its judgment dated December 10, 1976, in Income-tax Reference No. 45 of 1975 [1979] 119 ITR 377 (P & H), the Appellate Tribunal is right in law in holding that the assessee-firm is entitled to a finding in its favour under section 184(7) of the In....