TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2020 (12) TMI 887
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e. For the Respondent: Mr. Mr. Abhishek Anand and Mr. Viren Sharma, Advocates for R-2, 4 & 5. JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. (ORAL) 1. The hearing was conducted through video conferencing. 2. Petitioner impugns order dated 15.10.2020 whereby a liquidator has been appointed and the company has been directed to be liquidated, consequent to an order of admission dated 15.03.2019. 3. It is contend....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....wing sufficient case by a maximum period of 15 days. 6. He submits that today the appeal is beyond limitation and even the period extendable by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal is over. Learned counsel submits that appeal could not be filed within the time as the counsel for the petitioner was diagnosed with Covid-19 and had been under treatment and in isolation, during which period th....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ys. 9. It is settled position in law that powers of the High Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India are discretionary and have to be sparingly used and cannot be exercised in the "cloak of an appeal in disguise". 10. The admitted case of the petitioner is that the limitation as prescribed under Section 61 Sub Section (2) read with proviso is a strict period of limitation which cann....