TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
1989 (3) TMI 90
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....was a partition between the assessee and his son. Again a partition was made by the asses see between himself, his wife and minor unmarried daughter, by a deed dated March 4, 1978 (annexure-D). This partition was recognised by the Income-tax Officer under section 171 of the Income-tax Act and assessment was made in the status of a Hindu undivided family, though the return was filed as individual. ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....estion of law has been referred for our opinion : "Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that the partition amongst the assessee, his wife and his unmarried daughter was not valid and thus the order of the Income-tax Officer made under section 171 recognising the partition is not valid ?" The question is, when there is a single coparcener w....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....the question referred to us is concerned, the matter is self evident. A sole coparcener cannot divide the property with himself or grant any share in the property. In the absence of more than one coparcener, partition is impossible. The grant of any share in the property by the sole surviving male member of the Hindu undivided family to any other family member could be only in the nature of a sett....