2020 (12) TMI 806
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....y M/s. Hindustan National Glass and Industries Limited (hereinafter referred to as M/s. HNGIL) wherein raw materials received from M/s. HNGIL, after carrying out the process of proof machining and other activities which was classified under Central Excise Tariff i.e. other than raw cast articles of iron, are retuned back to M/s. HNGIL for use in further manufacture of glass bottles by HNGIL. 3. During the period, the Appellant has treated the above process as amounting to manufacture as the excise duty was paid on the finished goods by M/s, HNGIL and thus the appellant was taking the benefit of Notification No. 214/86-CE and no excise duty was paid by the Appellant. Also, the job charges received by the Appellant from M/S HNGIL was exempt from Service Tax vide notification No. 08/2005-ST dated 1st March, 2005 for the period up to 30/06/2012 and under clause (f) of section 66D of the Finance Act, 1994 w.e.f. 1st day of July'2012. The appellant availed Cenvat credit under Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 on input and input services used in relation to the manufacture of finished goods as well as provision of job work services. In this background, a Show cause notice (SCN) dat....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....; 1,40,675 4,15,575 2,61,050 2,20,035 10,37,335 Process amounting to Manufacture 66,60,770 89,60,435 93,07,640 1,21,54,227 3,70,83,072 Trade Sale (10% OF COST OR DIFF OF SALE AND COST PRICE, WHICH EVER IS HIGHER 1,61,333 1,86,700 85,392 1,62,708 5,96,133 Exempt Turnover 68,22,103 91,47,135 93,93,032 1,23,16,935 3,76,79,205 &nbs....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e any of the option and therefore in the appellant's case, the appellant has opted for option available under rule 6(3)(ii) of Cenvat Credit Rules, therefore the department has no role to decide regarding any other option available in these rules. 9. In support of his submissions, the Learned. Chartered Accountant has referred to the following judgments: a. M/s MERCEDES BENZ INDIA (P) LIMITED VS COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, PUNE-I 2015-TIOL-1550-CESTAT-MUM, b. M/s Philips Carbon Black Ltd. VERSUS C C Ex & Service Tax, Durgapur Excise Appeal No.76122 of 2016- FINAL ORDER NO.76973-76975/2019 dated 17/12/2019 c. M/s ETRANS SOLUTIONS PVT LTD Vs COMMISSIONER OF CGST AND CENTRAL EXCISE, KOLKATA 2019-TIOL-3327-CESTAT-KOL d. M/s ROCKEY MARKETING CHENNAI PVT LTDVs THE COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX, II, CHENNAI 2020-TIOL-1585-CESTAT-MAD 10. The learned Authorized Representative for the Revenue justifies the impugned orders. 11. Heard both sides through video conferencing and perused the appeal records. 12. The sho....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ices excluding exempted services, and shall take CENVAT credit only on inputs under sub-clauses (ii) and (iv) of clause (a) and input services under sub-clauses (ii) and (iv) of clause (b).] Notwithstanding anything contained in [(3) sub-rules (1) and (2), the manufacturer of goods or the provider of output service, opting not to maintain separate accounts, shall follow [any one] of the following options, as applicable to him, namely :- [(i) pay an amount equal to [six per cent.] of value of the exempted goods and exempted services; or (ii) pay an amount as determined under sub-rule (3A); or (iii) maintain separate accounts for the receipt, consumption and inventory of inputs as provided for in clause (a) of sub-rule (2), take CENVAT credit only on inputs under sub-clauses (ii) and (iv) of said clause (a) and pay an amount as determined under sub-rule (3A) in respect of input services. The provisions of sub-clauses (i) and (ii) of clause (b) and sub-clauses (i) and (ii) of clause (c) of sub-rule (3A) shall not apply for such payment : Provided that if any duty of excise is paid on the exempted goods, the same shall b....
TaxTMI