Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

1988 (12) TMI 63

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ons of law, one pertaining to the assessment years 1972-73 to 1975-76 and the other with regard to the assessment years 1974-75 and 1975-76. The question raised with regard to the former being : "Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was right in law in holding that under rule 1 (viii) of the First Schedule to the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964, ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he capital employed ?" The answer to the question referred regarding the assessment years 1972-73 to 1975-76 has clearly to be in the affimative, in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue, keeping in view our judgment in Income-tax Reference No. 70 of 1980 (CIT v. Pure Drinks (New Delhi) P. Ltd. [1989] 179 ITR 142 (P & H)), decided today, that is, December 1, 1988. The other question too....