Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2020 (12) TMI 609

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e grounds taken by the assessee read as under:- (a) On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Principal Commissioner of Income-tax, hereinafter referred to as the "Pr. CIT", has erred in invoking the provisions of section 263 of the Income tax Act, 1961 in the case of the appellant. (b) On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Pr. CIT has erred in concluding that the provisions of section 43CA are applicable in respect of a flat, held as stock in trade, transferred by the appellant prior to 1-4-2013 and thereby erred in concluding that the assessment order passed by the assessing officer is erroneous and also prejudicial to the interest of revenue. (c) The appellant respectfully submits ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....2 for Rs. 24 Lacs as against stamp duty value (SDV) of Rs. 31.45 Lacs which would attract the provisions of Sec.43CA which was not considered by Ld. AO and therefore, the order was erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the revenue. Accordingly, the assessee was show-caused regarding invocation of provisions of Sec.43CA. 3.3 The assessee defended the assessment order by submitting that the flat was sold in earlier year vide agreement dated 26/04/2012 and the entire sale proceeds were already received in financial year 2012-13. The occupation certificate was received on 07/09/2013. The assessee followed project completion method to offer the income to tax and therefore, this sale was shown in the books in AY 2014-15. The attention w....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....her appeal before us challenging the validity of revisional jurisdiction as exercised by Ld. Pr.CIT u/s 263. 4. Upon perusal of document on record, it is evident that the assessee entered into registered agreement for sale of proposed flat no. B/102 in certain project on 26/04/2012 for an agreed consideration of Rs. 24 Lacs as against stamp duty value of Rs. 31.45 Lacs. This document is a registered document. Upon perusal of terms and conditions, it is evident that the sale consideration of the flat was fixed at Rs. 24 Lacs and specific rights were created in a future property. The assessee was obligated to hand over the possession within a period of 24 months from the date of agreement. After going through the terms of the agreement, it....