Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2020 (12) TMI 173

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... to education purpose. 2. The CIT (Exemption) was not correct in treating that the Trust has not carried out noticeable activities to grant exemption u/s.80G of the Act, though the Appellant's activities covered for granting recognition u/s.80G. 3. The CIT (Exemption) erred in following decisions in the case of Ganjam Nagappa and Son and Self Employers institution as these decisions are not applicable to the Appellant's case and it is totally different. 4. The Appellant craves leave to add, to alter, to amend or to delete any of the grounds that may be urged at the time of hearing of the Appeal 3. The assessee duly registered under section 12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereafter called 'the Act'). T....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ee Trust has started providing education to poor students and also other students and there is no restriction in providing the education to any case, creed and religion. Presently in the institution totally 400-450 students are studying from LKG to 7th Standard. The assessee has provided the details of Fees Collection and Expenditure spent from AY 2017- 18 (FY 2016-17) to AY 2019-20 (FY 2018-19) which is as under: Year Fees Collection Expenditure Spent AY 2017-18( FY 2016-17) Rs. 26,50,000 Rs. 24,00,800 AY 2018-19 (FY 2017-18) Rs. 79,99,067 Rs. 78,84,142 AY 2019-20 (FY 2018-19)  Rs. 2,16,58,000 Rs. 1,42,35,775 4. Learned AR of the assessee stated that the assessee Trust carries on the education ac....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....IT (E) (ITA 29/Bang/2020) dated 25.02.2020, has held that the application for recognition u/s.80(G) cannot be rejected in absence of activities of the Trust. However the present case the assessee Trust is carrying on the educational charitable activities since its establishment. Hence, this decision is squarely applicable to the assessee's case. The assessee has relied on the following judgments: 1. Vidyashilp Community Trust Vs CIT (E) {ITA No.1619/Bang/2019} dated 15.11.2019, Bangalore ITAT. 2. Chiranthana Vs CIT (E) [ITA no.2014/Bang/2019} dated 02.01.2020 (ITAT Bangalore) 3. OLA Foundation Vs CIT (E) { ITA no.215/Bang/2018 dated 26.10.2018 (ITAT Bangalore) 4. Vimalalaya Hospital Trust Vs CIT (E) in IT....