Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2020 (11) TMI 932

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Revenue : Shri Vinod Kumar ORDER PER M. BALAGANESH (A.M): This appeal in ITA Nos.1305/Mum/2018, 1382/Mum/2018, 1304/Mum/2018 for A.Y.2009-10 arises out of the order by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-48, Mumbai in appeal No.CIT(A)-48/IT-194/DCCC-2(3)/2015-16 & CIT(A)-48/IT-193/DCCC-2(3)/2015-16 respectively dated 15/12/2017 (ld. CIT(A) in short) against the order of assessment passed u/s.143(3) rws 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as Act) dated 31/03/2015 by the ld. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax-CC-2(3)(hereinafter referred to as ld. AO). 2. The grounds raised by the assessee challenging the validity of reopening of assessment and with regard to non-granting of opportunity of cross examinat....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... prove the genuineness of the purchases. The ld. AO issued notice u/s.133(6) of the Act to the concerned suppliers, for which, as alleged by the ld. AO, no reply was received. We find that the ld. AO had also directed the assessee to produce the concerned parties which was not done by the assessee. Accordingly, the ld. AO concluded that assessee could not prove the genuineness of the purchases with supporting evidences and proceeded to treat the purchase made from the tainted suppliers amounting to Rs. 12,17,90,776/- as unexplained expenditure u/s.69C of the Act by observing that assessee had made purchases from grey market and source of payments for the same remain unexplained. It is pertinent to note that the ld. AO had in para 8 of his a....