2020 (1) TMI 1323
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ankar Chakraborty and Saptarshi Bhattacharjee JUDGMENT SABYASACHI BHATTACHARYYA J.- 1. The grievance of the petitioner is that the petitioner's Director Identification Number (DIN) was cancelled by dis- qualifying the petitioner in respect of all companies, of which he was a director, due to default apparently committed by one of such companies only. 2. Learned counsel appearing fo....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....g company. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent-authorities cites a Division Bench judgment, also unreported, of this court dated February 28, 2019 passed in M. A. T. No. 1248 of 2018 with C. A. N. No. 8275 of 2018 (Wajahat Husain v. Union of India), for the proposition that the disqualification in respect of the DIN operates not merely in respect of the erring company but all the ot....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e aforementioned narrative, it is amply clear that no ratio of law pertaining to the question-in-dispute in the present case was decided at all, either by the Division Bench or by the learned single judge, against whose order such appeal was preferred before the Division Bench. As such, the judgment cited on behalf of the respondent-authorities has no relevance to the instant case. However, the co....
TaxTMI