Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2020 (11) TMI 713

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... No. V/05/04/Misc/2019-GST ARC, dated 26.08.2020, issued by the 1st Respondent as illegal, improper and incorrect". 2) The averments made in the affidavit, filed in support of the Writ Petition show that, the Petitioner is duly registered under the Companies Act and doing business of manufacturing and sale of alcoholic and non-alcoholic beverages, ethanol etc. The Petitioner Company is registered with GST Department and is assigned to the Central jurisdiction, for the purpose of assessment. 3) It is said that, GST liability could not be cleared, by the Petitioner, in time, due to certain unforeseen circumstances in the Unit, but, however, subsequently, the same was cleared. 4) While things stood thus, a notice, dated 15.01.2019, ca....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....etter, dated 19.08.2020, to 2nd Respondent intimating that he is not liable to pay Cess since none of the outward supplies of the Petitioner fall within the ambit of cess and the amount of Rs. 8,78,836/- was inadvertently mentioned in Cess column of the returns instead of IGST Column. A Writ Petition came to be filed before the court challenging the penalty. 8) For the period January 2019 to December 2019, the 2nd Respondent issued another Notice, dated 28.07.2020, in Form GSTR ASMT-10 under Section 61(1) of CGST Act, showing the discrepancy of tax between GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B of Rs. 1,76,02,936/-. The same was explained by the Petitioner, vide letter, dated 26.08.2020, and requested three months time to discharge the liability wherever ap....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....herein has failed to pay GST liabilities and also file periodical returns i.e. GSTR-3B for various months within the prescribed due dates. It is stated that, though, the Petitioner has filed GSTR-1 for certain months, but failed to file GSTR-3B returns for the corresponding months. 13) In view of the above, it is urged that, no revenue is actually transferred to the Government, and on the other hand, the customers to whom the Petitioner has issued invoices would avail GST Credit, which the Petitioner has not paid. He further pleads that, failure on the part of the Petitioner to submit GSTR 3B returns within the prescribed time lead the authorities to recover the GST liability, which is inclusive of penalty. 14) The point that arises f....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ly a notice seeking explanation about the discrepancies contained therein, on or before 27.08.2020. Thus, without waiting for the explanation and without waiting till the said period is over, the Garnishee Notice came to be issued to the bank, in terms of Section 79(1)(c) of CGST Act, 2017. Therefore, initiating recovery proceedings even before the period given for filing reply is over, is in contravention of principles of natural justice. 18) Insofar as the period February 2018 to May 2018 is concerned, the Petitioner is said to have filed a valid return for part demand to the extent of Rs. 1,67,84,058/- within 30 days of service of assessment order and by virtue of Section 62(2) of the Act, the assessment order to the extent of which t....