Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2020 (11) TMI 708

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....PPELLANTS (BY SRI. E.I. SANMATHI, ADV.) RESPONDENT (BY SRI. S. PARTHASARATHI, ADV.) JUDGMENT ALOK ARADHE J., This appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act', for short) has been preferred by the revenue. The subject matter of the appeal pertains to the Assessment Year 2010-11. The appeal was admitted by a Bench of this Court vide order dated 28....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....engaged in the business of manufacture of pharmaceuticals. The assessee filed return of income for the Assessment Year 2010-11 on 18.09.2010 declaring the total income of Rs. 66,76,95,460/-. The Assessing Officer, vide order dated 18.05.2012 completed the assessment on book profits chargeable under Section 115-JB of the Act at Rs. 2,55,75,40,181/- while income under normal provision was assessed a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the decision of Gujarat High Court in 'CIT Vs. CADILA HEALTHCARE LTD.' 2014 TAXMANN 672 and has answered the issue in favour of the assessee. It is further submitted that no independent finding has been recorded by the Tribunal on the aforesaid issue. The aforesaid fact could not be disputed by the learned counsel for the assessee. 5. We have considered the submissions made on both sides....