2020 (11) TMI 600

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....dy, AM And Shri A. T. Varkey, JM For the Appellant: Shri Soumitra Choudhury, Advocate For the Respondent: Shri Jayanta Khanra, JCIT ORDER Per Shri A.T.Varkey, JM Both these appeals preferred by the different assessee's (Rice Mill's) against the separate orders of Ld. CIT(A), Burdwan dated 11.01.2019 and 01.02.2019 for AYs 2014-15 respectively. 2. The sole issue in both these appe....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....urnover of this assessee and made an addition of Rs. 2,43,61,260/-. 4. In the case of ITA No. 604/Kol/2019 brief facts are that the AO noted that the assessee failed to give details of purchases of paddy for cash, so having rejected the books of account of the assessee, the AO observed that the GP of 1.8% shown by assessee is too low and thereafter compared the GP results given by NABARD and ot....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....disputed about the quantity of the goods sold and purchased during the year. It is only in respect of the amount paid by assessee towards purchase of paddy in cash is suspect. According to the AO, due to the assessee's failure to give specific details of the farmers from whom the assessee's have purchased the paddy, the amount paid to them are unverifiable. According to us, when the quantity of th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nd 7% respectively. However, the Ld. CIT(A) in both the cases have adopted GP @ 3%. Before us, the Ld. AR Shri Soumitra Chowdhury, Advocate contended that certain comparable rice mills of the nearby locality as that of both the assessee's has not been considered and if it was considered by the Ld. CIT(A) then the GP would have come down. Be that as it may be, we note that in the first case the ass....