2020 (11) TMI 190

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 2. Present writ petition has been filed challenging order dated 1st July, 2020 whereby respondent no.2 has rejected petitioner's application for rectification of Form F for Assessment Year 2017-18. Petitioners further seek a direction to the respondents to issue Form 'F' for period May 2017 to March 2018. It is also prayed that respondents be prohibited from taking any coercive actions against the petitioner pursuant to directions dated 1st July, 2020. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that while filing its returns for the period April, 2017 to March, 2018, the petitioner had inadvertently mentioned the entire stock to be from Haryana whereas the stock had been procured from both Punjab and Haryana. He points out that on....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Mr. Satyakam, learned Additional Standing counsel for the respondents submits that the decision of this Court in M/s. Ingram Micro India Pvt. Ltd (supra) is under challenge before the Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 4573/2017 and the Supreme Court has granted leave in the said matter vide order dated 27th March, 2017. He also points out that this Court rendered decisions in several similar cases, including W.P. (C) No. 2633/2017, M/s. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. v. Commissioner, VAT decided on 11th April, 2017, which have been appealed against in the Supreme Court and the Supreme Court has stayed the operation of the judgment of this Court. 8. Mr. Satyakam points out that in the light of the interim orders passed by the Supreme Court, ....