Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2020 (10) TMI 1033

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....icitor General of India, appearing for the respondents. 2. By this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the action of the respondent No. 3 in rejecting the SVLDRS-1 Form submitted by the petitioner on 28.12.2019 and posted a Remark of rejection thereon. 3. On 04-12-2015 a Show Cause Notice was issued by the Central Goods and Service Tax Department demanding Rs. 1,01,54,295/- from the petitioner along with penalties and interest to the relevant financial year. The petitioner in the meantime, deposited Rs. 5,00,000/- (Rupees Five Lakhs) during the enquiry period. The demand raised was confirmed by the order dated 15.03.2017 adjudicated by the Joint Commissioner. 4. Against the said order, the petitioner preferred an Appeal before t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....arned counsel for the petitioner submits that while submitting the particular in Form SVLDRS-1, by inadvertence the petitioner made a mistake in furnishing the details with regard to the pre-deposit made by the petitioner. According to the petitioner, in addition to amount of Rs. 7,61,572/- (Rupees Seven Lakhs Sixty One Thousand Five Hundred Seventy Two) paid as amount of pre-deposit, the petitioner had also paid an additional amount of Rs. 2,53,857/-(Rupees Two Lakh Fifty Three Thousand Eight Hundred Fifty Seven) for hearing of the appeal before the CESTAT making it a total of Rs. 10,15,429/-(Rupees Ten Lakh Fifteen Thousand Four Hundred Twenty Nine). According to the petitioner, the amount of pre-deposit entered in the Form SVLDRS-1 ought....