2020 (10) TMI 1033
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....icitor General of India, appearing for the respondents. 2. By this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the action of the respondent No. 3 in rejecting the SVLDRS-1 Form submitted by the petitioner on 28.12.2019 and posted a Remark of rejection thereon. 3. On 04-12-2015 a Show Cause Notice was issued by the Central Goods and Service Tax Department demanding Rs. 1,01,54,295/- from the petitioner along with penalties and interest to the relevant financial year. The petitioner in the meantime, deposited Rs. 5,00,000/- (Rupees Five Lakhs) during the enquiry period. The demand raised was confirmed by the order dated 15.03.2017 adjudicated by the Joint Commissioner. 4. Against the said order, the petitioner preferred an Appeal before t....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....arned counsel for the petitioner submits that while submitting the particular in Form SVLDRS-1, by inadvertence the petitioner made a mistake in furnishing the details with regard to the pre-deposit made by the petitioner. According to the petitioner, in addition to amount of Rs. 7,61,572/- (Rupees Seven Lakhs Sixty One Thousand Five Hundred Seventy Two) paid as amount of pre-deposit, the petitioner had also paid an additional amount of Rs. 2,53,857/-(Rupees Two Lakh Fifty Three Thousand Eight Hundred Fifty Seven) for hearing of the appeal before the CESTAT making it a total of Rs. 10,15,429/-(Rupees Ten Lakh Fifteen Thousand Four Hundred Twenty Nine). According to the petitioner, the amount of pre-deposit entered in the Form SVLDRS-1 ought....




TaxTMI
TaxTMI